Open Access

The association of dyslipidemia and obesity with glycated hemoglobin

  • Jayesh Sheth1Email author,
  • Ankna Shah1,
  • Frenny Sheth1,
  • Sunil Trivedi1,
  • Nutan Nabar2,
  • Navneet Shah3,
  • Premal Thakor4 and
  • Rama Vaidya2
Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology20151:6

DOI: 10.1186/s40842-015-0004-6

Received: 1 January 2015

Accepted: 18 May 2015

Published: 23 June 2015



Dyslipidemia and obesity are the most common complex metabolic disorders taking the highest toll of health resources globally by its increasing incidences. This consequently leads to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disorders (CVDs) with variable reports about the role of metabolic factors on glycemic control. The current study is designed to determine the association of dyslipidemia and obesity with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in T2DM and non-diabetic subjects.


The present study was carried out in 931 subjects from urban Western India including 430 diabetic and 501 non-diabetic subjects with detailed anthropometric parameters. All subjects were investigated for HbA1c and lipid parameters like TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and non-HDL-C.


Dyslipidemia, central- and peripheral- obesity were observed (50.27 %; 75 % and 59.83 %) in all the study subjects respectively. Additionally, hyper-non-HDL-C was detected in 23.49 % and 22.56 % in T2DM and non-diabetic subjects. Significant linear associations of hyper-TC, hyper-LDL-C and hyper-non-HDL-C were observed with HbA1c in T2DM and non-diabetic control subjects respectively. Centrally- and peripherally- obese dyslipidemic subjects also showed a significant association with HbA1c in T2DM and control subjects respectively.


This study demonstrates the high prevalence of dyslipidemia and obesity in all subjects irrespective of their disease status in a Western Indian population. The dyslipidemic obese subjects had significant linear association with HbA1c in T2DM subjects.


Dyslipidemia Obesity T2DM HbA1c non-HDL-C


Dyslipidemia is associated with more than half of cases with ischemic heart disease and more than 4 million deaths per year [1]. In India, a rise in obesity and dyslipidemia with increasing urbanization have led to various lifestyle related disorders like T2DM, CVD and metabolic syndrome [1]. Among dyslipidemic subjects, increased LDL-C, TG and hypo-HDL are established markers for CAD risk. Additionally, TG-rich lipoproteins like VLDL and IDL contribute to total atherogenic cholesterol and are reflected by non-HDL-C which can be used as a secondary target for lipid lowering agents as proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) [2, 3] and may be used as the best risk predictor for stroke and cardiovascular complications [3].

Moreover, more than half a billion people worldwide are obese [4, 5] and has serious impact on multiple health outcomes [6]. World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes obesity and its complications amongst the top 10 global risk factors leading to ~40 % global deaths [7]. The menace of obesity is attaining an epidemic worldwide due to changes in life style and food habits. It is defined as a state of excess adipose tissue mass, and not by the body weight alone since muscular individuals may possibly have overall weight gain or high body mass index (BMI) without an increase in adiposity. Thus, those who are not peripherally obese or overweight might be centrally obese with high percentage of body fat distributed predominantly in the abdominal region [8]. In centrally obese individuals, adipose tissue releases higher amounts of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), glycerol, hormones, pro-inflammatory cytokines contributing to insulin resistance (IR) [9, 10]. Asian Indians are found to have higher intra-abdominal fat, visceral fat and metabolic disturbances as compared to Caucasians [8, 11] with 3 out of 4 (73 %) urban Indians being overweight [12]. Based on recently reported prevalence of obesity in India, it has been shown that every second urban Indian is obese with the highest risk of weight gain between 28–38 years [12].

These metabolic dysregulators like dyslipidemia and obesity along with other lifestyle factors are known to be associated with T2DM, [2, 1315] characterized by hyperglycemia [16]. As per the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 2013 estimate, India ranks second amongst the top 10 countries with 65.1 million diabetic subjects with an alarming high rate. It is further set to increase up to 109.0 million with a global estimate of 592 million by the year 2035 [17].

IDF estimates that nearly 175 million individuals are undiagnosed with diabetes globally [17]. The disease manifestation takes place much before its clinical appearance; subjects with T2DM are often asymptomatic initially as early as 12 years before the diagnosis and continue to remain asymptomatic throughout the disease process. Consequently, the age of diagnosis may not accurately reflect the age of onset of the disease [18].

It will be fruitful to detect early diabetics in India to curtail the ever increasing incidence of T2DM so that suitable lifestyle modifications may be suggested to prevent or postpone the onset of T2DM. Our study therefore attempted to demonstrate the influence of dyslipidemia and obesity on HbA1c in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects and whether can it be advocated as a combined ‘biomarker of lifestyle pattern’. Moreover, the novelty of the study is an attempt to demonstrate the association of combined effect of dyslipidemia and obesity on HbA1c in Western Indian urban population due to paucity of such studies [19].



The current prospective study was carried out on the Western Indian population (Gujarat and Maharashtra) that comprised of 931 unrelated participants (430 previously diagnosed T2DM patients and 501 non-diabetic control subjects) in the age range of 25 to 89 years. They were enrolled by consecutive sampling during April, 2012 to October, 2014. All T2DM subjects satisfied the inclusion criteria of age ≥25 years, duration of diabetes (≥6 months from the date of diagnosis) and plasma glucose level [Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >126.0 mg/dl, post prandial plasma glucose (PPPG) >190.0 mg/dl]. The inclusion criteria for control subjects were age ≥25 years, plasma glucose level (FPG) <110.0 mg/dl) and HbA1c level ≤6.5 %. The study was approved by the institutional ethical committee and ISBEC (Intersystem Biomedica Ethics Committee). Informed written consent from all participating subjects was obtained prior to the enrolment. Those with T1DM, other concomitant illness, lactating and pregnant mothers and those who were on medication of lipid lowering agents (statins, fibrates) were excluded from the study. Anthropometric parameters such as BMI, waist circumference (WC) and duration of T2DM were recorded for all the participating subjects as shown in Table 1. T2DM patients were treated with biguanides, sulphonylureas, PPARγ activators, DPP4 inhibitors and α glucosidase inhibitors alone or in combinations as advised by their physicians.
Table 1

Anthropometric and biochemical parameters in T2DM and control subjects

Parameters (T = 931 subjects)

T2DM (n = 430)

Control (n = 501)

p value

Mean ± SD (range)

Mean ± SD (range)

Anthropometric indices

Age (Yrs.)

56.57 ± 10.52

48.60 ± 12.95




BMI (Kg/m 2 )

27.34 ± 5.12

25.83 ± 4.62




WC (cm)

96.88 ± 10.28

92.11 ± 10.72




Biochemical Parameters

FPG (mg/dl)

140.79 ± 48.31

88.27 ± 12.39


PPPG (mg/dl)

189.53 ± 66.85



HbA1c (%)

8.18 ± 1.81

5.68 ± 0.51


FI (uIU/ml)

11.02 ± 6.47

11.97 ± 5.44



3.85 ± 2.30

2.67 ± 1.56


TC (mg/dl)

181.56 ± 52.01

181.97 ± 46.18


TG (mg/dl)

142.04 ± 73.30

112.03 ± 53.80


HDL-C (mg/dl)

54.24 ± 16.77

56.79 ± 17.33


LDL-C (mg/dl)

97.94 ± 50.33

102.13 ± 45.14


Non-HDL-C (mg/dl)

127.32 ± 53.21

125.18 ± 47.10


By Independent Student’s t-test, *: Significant, SD: Standard deviation

BMI: Body mass index, WC: Waist circumference, FPG: Fasting plasma glucose, PPPG: Post prandial plasma glucose, HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin, FI: Fasting Insulin, HOMA-IR: Homeostasis Model of Assessment-Insulin Resistance Index, TC: Total cholesterol, TG: Triglycerides, HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Non-HDL-C: TC-HDL-C

Anthropometric indices

Weight was measured with light clothes and without shoes using a digital scale (to the nearest 0.1 kg). Height was measured without shoes using a stadiometer (to the nearest 0.1 cm). Waist circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm. BMI was calculated using the equation “BMI = weight/height2 (kg/meter2)”. The cut offs used in this study to characterize participants for obesity were based on the Executive Summary of the Third Report of the NCEP, ATP III and the IDF guidelines for South-Asian population [2, 17]. Obesity as a whole was defined as BMI >25 kg/m2; and central obesity was defined as WC >90 cm for males and WC >80 cm for females.

Sample collection and handling

Blood samples were collected in fluoride, EDTA and serum vaccutainers between 8:00 to 11:00 am after 12 h of fasting for biochemical assays such as FPG, HbA1c, fasting insulin (FI), insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and lipid profile estimation. Blood was collected again after 2 h of consuming non-standardized meal for PPPG estimation for T2DM subjects. Serum was separated within 30–45 min, aliquoted and stored at −20 °C till analysis.

Biochemical investigations

FPG, PPPG and lipid profile including total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured by colorimetric method with respective calibrator and biological standards. All biochemical investigations were carried out by commercially available kits using an auto-analyzer system (BTS 330, Biosystem, Spain). HbA1c was analyzed by affinity assay using the Nyco Card reader-II (Axis-Shield, Norway). FI levels were measured by Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) with a commercial kit (Immunotech, France). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-HDL-C were calculated by a standard formula [LDL = TC - HDL-C - (TG/5)] and [non-HDL-C = TC - HDL-C] [20]. Insulin resistance was calculated by the Homeostasis Model of Assessment-Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR) with a model formula [HOMA-IR = (FI × FPG)/405] [21].

The intra assay coefficients of variations for lipid parameters were; TC: 1.39 %, TG: 0.50 % and HDL-C: 1.67 % whereas the inter assay coefficients of variations for aforesaid lipids were; 2.65 %, 1.65 % and 4.69 % respectively.

The cut offs for dyslipidemia used in this study were based on the IDF guidelines for South-Asian population. The hypercholesterolemia (hyper-TC) and hypertriglyceridemia (hyper-TG) were considered with TC ≥ 220 mg/dl and TG ≥ 150 mg/dl respectively; whereas, those with HDL-C ≤ 40 mg/dl, LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dl and non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dl were considered hypo-HDL-cholesterolemia (hypo-HDL-C), hyper-LDL-cholesterolemia (hyper-LDL-C) and hyper-non-HDL-cholesterolemia (hyper-non-HDL-C) respectively. TC < 220 mg/dl, TG < 150 mg/dl, HDL-C > 40 mg/dl LDL-C < 130 mg/dl and non-HDL-C < 160 mg/dl were regarded as normal in accordance with IDF and NCEP guidelines [2, 17]. Dyslipidemia is defined by presence of one or more abnormal serum lipid biomarker concentration.

Statistical analysis

The sample size yielded a margin of error of 3.3 % in the study and a confidence limit of 95 % with an on-line calculator [22]. False positive error rate/Type I error was 0.05. The value of HbA1c was given as a percentage of total hemoglobin; and values of all other lipid parameters were given in mg/dl. All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Linear regression, bivariate correlation analysis (using Pearson’s correlation coefficient) and student’s t-test analysis were carried out with IBM-SPSS v15.0. p values (two tailed) ≤0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


Assessment of Anthropometric indices and Biochemical parameters

Total 931 subjects were included in the study, 430 were T2DM (diagnosed for >6 months) and 501 were non-diabetic control subjects. Baseline characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. The average duration of diabetes in T2DM subjects at inclusion was 8.39 ± 7.53 years (6 months to 40 years). Significantly higher mean FPG and HbA1c were observed in T2DM as compared to non-diabetic control subjects (FPG: p < 0.001 and HbA1c: p <0.001) respectively. Additionally, higher mean HOMA-IR, TC, TG and non-HDL-C were also observed in T2DM than in non-diabetic control subjects (HOMA-IR: p <0.001, TC: p = 0.008, TG: p < 0.001and non-HDL-C: p = 0.034) respectively.

Prevalence of dyslipidemia and obesity

Dyslipidemia was seen in 50.27 % of the study population with highest in T2DM amongst both the groups followed by control subjects (53.72 % and 47.31 % respectively). Hyper-TC was observed in 19.76 % (85) and 20.56 % (103) of T2DM and control subjects respectively. Hyper-TG was higher in T2DM compared to control subjects [33.26 % (143) 19.56 % (98)], whereas hypo-HDL-C was 18.61 % (80) in T2DM and 17.54 % (88) in non-diabetic subjects. Furthermore, prevalence of hyper-LDL-C and hyper-non-HDL-C were almost at par in both the groups 23.02 % (99); vs. 25.95 % and 23.49 % (101) vs. 22.56 % (113) in T2DM compared to control subjects respectively (Data not shown).

The prevalence of central obesity was found to be higher (75 %) compared to peripheral obesity (59.83 %) in overall study population. Higher central obesity was seen in T2DM as compared to non-diabetic control subjects [82.56 % (355) vs. 70.26 % (352)] respectively. Similarly, incidence of peripheral obesity was also higher in T2DM than non-diabetic control subjects [66.27 % (283) vs. 54.29 % (272)] respectively (Data not shown).

Association of dyslipidemia, central obesity and peripheral obesity with HbA1c levels

A significant linear association of hyper-TC, hyper-LDL-C and hyper-non-HDL-C with HbA1c was observed in T2DM and control subjects. Though, significant correlation between hyper-TG and hypo-HDL-C to HbA1c was not observed in subjects of the both groups (Table 2). Additionally, we also observed an association between normal HDL-C, LDL-C and non-HDL-C with HbA1c in control subjects. Though, higher WC or higher BMI per se had no independent association with HbA1c levels in any of the groups as shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Correlation of HbA1c on dyslipidemia and obesity

Parameters (T = 931 subjects)

T2DM (N = 430)

Controls (N = 501)

Association with HbA1c

Association with HbA1c







Lipid parameters

Hyper TC







Normal TC







Hyper TG







Normal TG







Hypo HDL







Normal HDL







Hyper LDL







Normal LDL







Hyper non-HDL-C







Normal non-HDL-C








Higher WC







Normal WC







Higher BMI







Normal BMI







By Linear regression and bivariate analysis using Pearson’s correlation coefficient considering HbA1c as a dependent variable, *: Significant

BMI: Body mass index, WC: Waist circumference, TC: Total cholesterol, TG: Triglycerides, HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-HDL-C: TC-HDL

Hyper TC: TC ≥ 220 mg/dl, Hyper TG: TG ≥ 150 mg/dl respectively, Hypo-HDL: HDL-C ≤ 40 mg/dl, Hyper-LDL: LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dl, Hyper-Non-HDL: Non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dl, Higher WC: Male WC > 90 cm and Female WC > 80 cm, Higher BMI: BMI > 25 kg/m2

Nonetheless, significant linear association was observed in T2DM subjects with central- and peripheral- obesity along with dyslipidemia, while such correlation was not seen in non-diabetic subjects (Figs. 1 and 2).
Fig. 1

Association of central obesity with HbA1c in dyslipidemic T2DM subjects

Fig. 2

Association of peripheral obesity with HbA1c in dyslipidemic T2DM subjects


The present population-based study was carried out on subjects from urban Western India with a mixed ethnicity. The major contributing factor for the higher risk of developing diabetes is likely to be due to increased prevalence of central- and peripheral- obesity in all the study subjects which is almost similar to the previous observation of ~30-65 % Indian urban being overweight or obese [23]. Obesity is known to be associated with increased amount of adipose tissue or its disproportionate distribution between central- and peripheral- body regions which is also related to the development of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and CAD that increases the susceptibility of developing T2DM [24]. In addition to the storage of lipids in the adipose tissue, adipocytokines like adiponectin, leptin, TNF, IL-6, resistin play an important role in tissue physiology and have been shown to be linked to obesity, insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction [24]. McTernan et al. in their animal study showed an increased resistin expression in adipose cells obtained from abdominal and omental region possibly contributing to insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and development of T2DM [25]. This could explain why obese T2DM subjects with dyslipidemia had poor hemoglobin glycation as compared to non-obese T2DM subjects in our study. The present study showed a higher number of T2DM subjects with central obesity as compared to peripheral obesity, which could be due to higher rates of lipolysis in visceral fat than subcutaneous fat by catecholamines [26]. This may in turn result into an increased FFA delivery to the liver, consequently stimulates hepatic glucose production by fatty acids (FA) causing interference in hepatic insulin removal, and may further accentuate insulin resistance [26].

Additionally, our subjects with hyper-TC, hyper-LDL-C and hyper-non-HDL-C alone or combined with obesity in T2DM group have shown poorly controlled HbA1c as compared to those with normal level of these parameters. Several reports have shown significant influence of lipid concentration on hemoglobin glycation and increased CVD risk possibly due to increased insulin resistance [2729]. Nonetheless, these studies had stratified subjects based on their glycation control and observed their overall mean of lipid parameters, whereas in our study we had stratified subjects based on their dyslipidemia and obesity followed by observation of glycation pattern. Hyperglycemia promotes increase in LDL glycation and affinity towards LDL-receptors on macrophages; stimulate foam cell formation, endothelial cell toxicity and smooth muscle proliferation responsible for coronary artery and macrovascular complications [1].

We observed a significant association of non-HDL-C with HbA1c in our study which is in accordance with a recent study in Nepalese’ T2DM subjects [27]. Recent studies have also shown the utility of non-HDL-C as a significant biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment and as a secondary target to monitor the effect of lipid lowering agents [3, 20]. It can be inferred that subjects with hyper-non-HDL-C are at an increased risk of CVD.

Our study could not demonstrate significant association of hyper-TG levels in T2DM subjects as compared to non-diabetic control subjects, contrary to the studies by Ikhas et al., and Schulze et al., which could be due to poor glycemic control that mask the effects of TG in higher glycation group [29, 30].

The Lipid Research clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial established that each 1 % fall in TC levels results into 2 % reduction in CAD risk [31]. A study carried out in Helsinki determined that with 11 % fall in LDL-C levels, there is 34 % reduced risk of CAD [31]. The present study observed an incidence of hyper-TC in 19.77 % of T2DM and 20.56 % of non-diabetic controls.

Moreover an increased dyslipidemia is likely to increase HbA1c and vice versa as the correlation between these parameters are directly proportional and goes hand-in-hand [27, 32]. Reduction in HbA1c in T2DM is associated with improved insulin sensitivity and better lipid parameters.

There are several mechanisms to elicit the effects of increased physical activity to improve dyslipidemia as it increases glucose removal and decreases muscle and hepatic IR through a number of mechanisms that would not necessarily be associated with changes in body weight [33]. This is in accordance with our results where we could not find correlation of HbA1c with BMI (which is an indicator of overall weight gain). However, increased physical activity and lifestyle modification seems to be associated with decreased HbA1c and better glycemic and lipid control. Thus, targeting to lower the dyslipidemia and obesity is likely to reduce HbA1c not only in diabetic subjects but it will have an equal effect in non-diabetic subjects.


Dyslipidemia and obesity are significantly associated with poorly controlled hemoglobin glycation in T2DM and non-diabetic subjects. Additionally, higher prevalence of non-HDL-C in the study subjects suggesting its possible role as a biomarker for CVD.



Type 2 diabetes mellitus


Cardiovascular disorders


Hemoglobin glycation


Total cholesterol




High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol


Low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol


Non-High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol


Coronary artery disease




Intermediate- density-lipoproteins


National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III


World Health Organization


Body mass index


Non-esterified fatty acids


International Diabetes Federation


Intersystem Biomedica Ethics Committee


Waist circumference


Fasting plasma glucose


Post prandial plasma glucose


Fasting insulin


Immune Radiometric Assay


Homeostasis Model of Assessment-Insulin Resistance Index


Coronary heart disease


The Diabetes Complications and Control Trial



This part of the study was funded by GICT (Gujarat Institute of Chemical Technology), which we gratefully acknowledge. Our sincere thanks to Mrs. Jyothi Lekshmi and Dr. Mamta Lele for their partial technical help. Special thanks to Mr. Harsh Sheth for his valuable suggestions in statistical analysis and proof reading of the manuscript. Sincere thanks to all the clinicians for their co-operation and kind referrals. We wish to express a deep sense of gratitude for the participating subjects and their families who have made this study possible.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, FRIGE’s Institute of Human Genetics, FRIGE House,
Unit of Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Kasturba Health Society, Medical Research Centre
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sterling Hospital
Gujarat Diabetic Association


  1. Singh AK, Singh SK, Singh N, Agrawal N, Gopal K. Obesity and dyslipidemia. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2(3):824–8.Google Scholar
  2. Executive summary of the Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97. doi:10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.
  3. Peters A. Clinical Relevance of Non-HDL Cholesterol in Patients with Diabetes. Clinical Diabetes. 2008;26(1):1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM),, accessed on 09/07/2014.
  5. Global Health Observatory. Obesity: situation and trends. World Health Organization. 2013. Available from:, accessed on 09/07/2014.
  6. Lewis CE, McTigue KM, Burke LE, Poirier P, Eckel RH, Howard BV, et al. Mortality, health outcomes, and body mass index in the overweight range: A science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;119:3263–71. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192574.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sabale BB, Barhate AA. Study of prevalence of overweight and obesity in shopkeepers in wetern Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2014;3(2):419–22.Google Scholar
  8. Raji A, Seely EW, Arky RA, Simonson DC. Body Fat Distribution and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5366–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahn S, Hull R, Utzschneider M. Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2006;444(7121):840–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginsberg H, Plutzky J, Sobel BE. A review of metabolic and cardiovascular effects of oral antidiabetic agents: beyond glucose-level lowering. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1999;6:337–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Forouhi N: Ethnicity and metabolic syndrome. In: The metabolic syndrome. Edited by: Byrne CD and Wild SH. England: John Wiley & Sons; 2006: 46-47. ISBN 0-555050005-5.
  12. Indian statistics. assessed on 11/12/2014
  13. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes res clin prac 2010, 87: 4-14.
  14. World Health Organization: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO consultation. Part 1, Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. 1999.
  15. Balkau B, Charles MA. Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultation. Diabetic Medicine. 1999;16:442–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:62–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. IDF: Diabetes atlas 2013, International Diabetes Federation. 6th ed. assessed on 11/12/2014.
  18. Fonseca VA: Defining and Characterizing the progression of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32(supplement 2): S151-S156. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S301.
  19. Jain M, Jadeja JM, Mehta N. Correlation Between HbA1c Values And Lipid Profile In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Basic and Applied Physiology. 2013;2(1):47–50.Google Scholar
  20. Virani SS: Non-HDL Cholesterol as a Metric of Good Quality of Care Opportunities and Challenges. Texas Heart Institute Journal 2011;38(2):160-162.
  21. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Online sample size calculator by Raosoft, Inc., accessed on 09/07/2014.
  23. Misra A, Khurana L. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in developing countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(11):9–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Soodini GR, Hamdy O: Adiponectin and Leptin in Relation to Insulin Sensitivity. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2004;2(2):114-123.
  25. McTernan CL, McTernan PG, Harte AL, Levick PL, Barnett AH, Kumar S. Resistin, central obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2002;359:46–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayashi T, Boyko EJ, Leonetti DL, Mcneely M, Morris L, Kahn S, et al. Visceral adiposity and the risk of impaired glucose tolerance: A prospective study among Japanese Americans. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:650–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahato RV, Gyawali P, Raut P, Regmi P, Singh K, Pandeya DR, et al. Association between glycaemic control and serum lipid profile in type 2 diabetic patients: Glycated haemoglobin as a dual biomarker. Biomedical Research. 2011;22(3):375–80.Google Scholar
  28. Charitha B, Senghor AR, Shivashekar M, William E. Glycated Hemoglobin as a Dual Marker: In Control of Glycemic Status and Diabetic Dyslipidemia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2013;5(3):111–3.Google Scholar
  29. Hammed IK, Abed BA, Rashid NF. Glycated haemoglobin as a dual biomarker Association between HbA1c and dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic patients. J Fac Med Baghdad. 2012;54(1):88–92.Google Scholar
  30. Schulze MB, Shai I, Manson JE, Li T, Rifai N, Jiang R, et al. Joint role of non-HDL cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin in predicting future coronary heart disease events among women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47:2129–36. Doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1593-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Prabhavathi K, Kirthana KU, Jaisri G. Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) - A Marker of Circulating Lipids in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(2):20–3.Google Scholar
  32. DCCT Research Group. The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: The perspective of the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1996;45(10):1289–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanghani NB, Parchwani DN, Palandurkar KM, Shah AM, Dhanani JV. Impact of lifestyle modifi cation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocr Metab. 2013;17:1030–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Sheth et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.