Skip to main content

Table 4 Studies on prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus–worldwide

From: Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in urban and rural Tamil Nadu using IADPSG and WHO 1999 criteria (WINGS 6)

Author Name City/Country Sample Size Prevalence Criteria used for GDM diagnosis
Agarwal et al. (2007) Al Ain, United Arab Emirates 1172 20.6 % WHO 1999
Tan et al. (2007) Malaysia 1600 11.4 % WHO 1999
Bener et al. (2011) Doha, Qatar 1608 16.3 % WHO 1999
Moses et al. (2011) Australia 1275 9.6 % 13.0 % ADIPS IADPSG
Dahanayaka et al. (2012) Sri Lanka 405 8.9 % IADPSG
Jenum et al. (2012) Oslo, Norway 823 13 % 31.5 % WHO 1999 IADPSG
Kalter-Leibovivi et al. (2012) Israel 3,345 9 % IADPSG
Reyes-Munoz E et al. (2012) Mexico 803 10.3 % 30.1 % ADA 2005 IADPSG
Kanjana et al. (2013) Thailand 6324 2.6 % IADPSG
Duran et al. (2014) Madrid, Spain 1750 1526 10.6 % 35.5 % Carpenter & Coustan IADPSG
Shang et al. (2014) China 3083 19.9 % 7.98 % IADPSG ADA 2005
Liao et al. (2014) Chengdu, China 5630 11.7 % 24.5 % ADA 2005 IADPSG
Leng et al. (2015) Tianjin, China 18589 8.1 % 9.3 % WHO 1999 IADPSG
Hung et al. (2015) Taoyuan, China 3056 3641 4.6 % 12.4 % ADA 2005 IADPSG
Sibartie et al. (2015) Australia 10103 3.4 % 3.5 % ADIPS IADPSG
Ethridge et al. (2015) Ohio, United States of America 8390 4 % 3.3 % Carpenter & Coustan IADPSG
O’Sullivan et al. (2016) Galway, Ireland 5500 12.4 % 9.4 % IADPSG WHO 1999