Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in urban and rural Tamil Nadu using IADPSG and WHO 1999 criteria (WINGS 6)

Table 4 Studies on prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus–worldwide

Author Name	City/Country	Sample Size	Prevalence	Criteria used for GDM diagnosis
Agarwal et al. (2007)	Al Ain, United Arab Emirates	1172	20.6 %	WHO 1999
Tan et al. (2007)	Malaysia	1600	11.4 %	WHO 1999
Bener et al. (2011)	Doha, Qatar	1608	16.3 %	WHO 1999
Moses et al. (2011)	Australia	1275	9.6 % 13.0 %	ADIPS IADPSG
Dahanayaka et al. (2012)	Sri Lanka	405	8.9 %	IADPSG
Jenum et al. (2012)	Oslo, Norway	823	13 % 31.5 %	WHO 1999 IADPSG
Kalter-Leibovivi et al. (2012)	Israel	3,345	9 %	IADPSG
Reyes-Munoz E et al. (2012)	Mexico	803	10.3 % 30.1 %	ADA 2005 IADPSG
Kanjana et al. (2013)	Thailand	6324	2.6 %	IADPSG
Duran et al. (2014)	Madrid, Spain	1750 1526	10.6 % 35.5 %	Carpenter & Coustan IADPSG
Shang et al. (2014)	China	3083	19.9 % 7.98 %	IADPSG ADA 2005
Liao et al. (2014)	Chengdu, China	5630	11.7 % 24.5 %	ADA 2005 IADPSG
Leng et al. (2015)	Tianjin, China	18589	8.1 % 9.3 %	WHO 1999 IADPSG
Hung et al. (2015)	Taoyuan, China	3056 3641	4.6 % 12.4 %	ADA 2005 IADPSG
Sibartie et al. (2015)	Australia	10103	3.4 % 3.5 %	ADIPS IADPSG
Ethridge et al. (2015)	Ohio, United States of America	8390	4 % 3.3 %	Carpenter & Coustan IADPSG
O’Sullivan et al. (2016)	Galway, Ireland	5500	12.4 % 9.4 %	IADPSG WHO 1999

ISSN: 2055-8260