Table 5 Studies on prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in India
Author Name | City/State | Sample Size | Prevalence | Criteria used for GDM diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Seshiah et al. (2004) | Government Maternity Hospital, Chennai | 3674 | 16.5Â % | WHO 1999 |
Seshiah et al. (2008) | Chennai, South India | 4151 | Urban-17.8Â % Semiurban-13.8Â % Rural-9.9Â % | WHO 1999 |
Swami et al. (2008) | Tertiary care hospital in Maharashtra | 1225 | 7.7Â % | ADA 2005 |
Seshiah et al. (2011) | Chennai, South India | 1463 | 13.4Â % | DIPSI |
Wahi et al. (2011) | Govt Medical College Hospital, Jammu region | 2025 | 6.9Â % | DIPSI |
Nayak et al. (2013) | Pondicherry Institute of Medical Science | 304 | 27Â % | IADPSG |
Vanlalhruaii et al. (2013) | Regional Institute of Medical Sciences Manipur | 300 | 8.1Â % | ADA 2005 |
Rajput et al. (2013) | Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Haryana | 607 | 7.1Â % | ADA 2005 |
Zargar et al. (2004) | Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences | 2000 | 3.1Â % 4.4Â % | Carpenter & Coustan WHO 1999 |
Raja et al. (2014) | Government Medical College Srinagar Kashmir valley | 306 | 7.8Â % | DIPSI |
Rajput et al. (2014) | Rural Haryana | 900 | 13.9Â % 9.7Â % | WHO 1999 ADA 2005 |
Kalyani et al. (2014) | Central India | 300 | 8.33Â % | WHO 1999 |
Arora et al. (2015) | Ludhiana, Punjab | 5100 | 34.9Â % 9Â % | IADPSG WHO 1999 |
Gopalakrishnan V et al. (2015) | Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. | 332 | 41.9Â % | IADPSG |
Present study | Chennai, India | 1774 | 18.5Â % 14.6Â % | IADPSG WHO 1999 |