Skip to main content

Table 6 Statistical summary of 19 previously published reviews of peer support for which it was possible to abstract percentages of studies reporting effect in specific categories of application of peer support

From: Peer support of complex health behaviors in prevention and disease management with special reference to diabetes: systematic reviews

   

Lowest, highest, and median %s of studies identified as reporting effects in specific categories of application

First author

# studies

Year

Lowest

Highest

Median

Ingram

11

2010

25

100

67

Ayala

17

2010

50

91

83

Repper

40

2011

40

89

64.5

Kenya

16

2011

44

81

62.5

Hunt

16

2011

80

100

90

Chapman

26

2010

0

75

37.5

Gugliani

23

2011

0

100

67

Lewin

82

2010

0

70

33

Pfeiffer

7

2010

0

71

35.5

Viswanathan

53

2010

14

67

29

Dale

7

2008

0

100

40

Hoey

43

2008

38

50

44

Brownstein

14

2007

90

100

90

Gibbons

12

2007

60

100

75

Norris

18

2006

36

75

50

van Dam

6

2005

40

100

73.5

Andrews

24

2004

67

100

78

Eysenbach

38

2004

50

67

58.5

Swider

20

2002

50

83

75

Means

  

36

85.2

60.7

Medians

  

40

89

64.5