Skip to main content

Table 1 Noninvasive imaging assessment of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis

From: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: where do Diabetologists stand?

Diagnostic modality

Advantages

Disadvantages

USa

• Noninvasive

• Inexpensive

• Widely available

• Fair accuracy in moderate to severe hepatic steatosis (≥ S2)a

• ↓sensitivity when hepatic steatosis < 20–33%a

• Operator-dependent

• ↓accuracy in patients with chronic liver disease or obesity

VCTE (CAPa & LSMb)

• Noninvasive

• Inexpensive

• Widely available

• Reproducible

• Advanced fibrosis stagingb

• Technical limitations in patients with ascites, morbid obesity, or ↑chest wall fat

• Measurement failure

MRI-PDFFa & MREb

• Noninvasive

• Quantification of hepatic steatosisa (helpful in patients with ↓grade hepatic steatosis)

• Excellent reproducibility

• Advanced fibrosis stagingb

• Expensive

• Small sample volume/not convenient for patients with uneven fatty changesa

  1. asteatosis assessment. b fibrosis assessment
  2. Abbreviations: US Ultrasonography, VCTE Vibration-controlled transient elastography, CAP Controlled attenuation parameter, LSM liver Stiffness measurement, MRI-PDFF Magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction, MRE Magnetic resonance elastography