Skip to main content

The epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)

Abstract

Background

The most common type of monogenic diabetes is maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of endocrine disorders that affect 1–5% of all patients with diabetes mellitus. MODY is characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance but de novo mutations have been reported. Clinical features of MODY include young-onset hyperglycemia, evidence of residual pancreatic function, and lack of beta cell autoimmunity or insulin resistance. Glucose-lowering medications are the main treatment options for MODY. The growing recognition of the clinical and public health significance of MODY by clinicians, researchers, and governments may lead to improved screening and diagnostic practices. Consequently, this review article aims to discuss the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of MODY based on relevant literature published from 1975 to 2020.

Main body

The estimated prevalence of MODY from European cohorts is 1 per 10,000 in adults and 1 per 23,000 in children. Since little is known about the prevalence of MODY in African, Asian, South American, and Middle Eastern populations, further research in non-European cohorts is needed to help elucidate MODY’s exact prevalence. Currently, 14 distinct subtypes of MODY can be diagnosed through clinical assessment and genetic analysis. Various genetic mutations and disease mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of MODY. Management of MODY is subtype-specific and includes diet, oral antidiabetic drugs, or insulin.

Conclusions

Incidence and prevalence estimates for MODY are derived from epidemiologic studies of young people with diabetes who live in Europe, Australia, and North America. Mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of MODY include defective transcriptional regulation, abnormal metabolic enzymes, protein misfolding, dysfunctional ion channels, or impaired signal transduction. Clinicians should understand the epidemiology and pathogenesis of MODY because such knowledge is crucial for accurate diagnosis, individualized patient management, and screening of family members.

Background

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is the most common type of monogenic diabetes, a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of endocrine disorders resulting from mutations affecting a single gene involved in pancreatic beta cell function [1]. In 1975, Fajans and Tattersall used the acronym MODY for the first time in the literature to describe a cohort of patients with familial diabetes characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance of a primary defect in insulin secretion [2,3,4]. Currently, MODY accounts for 1–5% of all diabetes mellitus cases [5, 6]. Advancements in molecular diagnostics have led to the identification of 14 distinct subtypes of MODY thus far [7,8,9,10,11]. The most frequently occurring subtypes are attributed to mutations in genes encoding glucokinase (GCK) and hepatocyte nuclear factors (HNFs) [6, 12, 13]. Established treatment options for MODY include various glucose-lowering medications such as sulfonylureas, meglitinides, and insulin [9, 10]. MODY subtypes with progressive beta cell dysfunction may also require long-term management of diabetes-related complications.

The clinical and public health significance of MODY is increasingly being recognized by clinicians, researchers, and governments [14], which may help expand screening and genetic testing capacity. Consequently, this article aims to review current understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of MODY based on relevant literature published from 1975 to 2020.

Diagnosis of MODY

Early-onset diabetes, insulin independence, and autosomal dominant inheritance are traditionally associated with MODY [15]. Age of onset is particularly useful for distinguishing MODY from other types of diabetes. However, MODY subtypes with variable age of onset, low penetrance, or atypical presentation may not fulfill classical diagnostic criteria [15,16,17,18]. Furthermore, in a study involving 922 families referred for MODY testing, spontaneous de novo mutations affecting GCK, HNF1A, or HNF4A genes were reported in 11 of the 150 individuals who did not have autosomal dominant inheritance of diabetes mellitus or a multigenerational family history of hyperglycemia [19]. Refinement of the classical diagnostic triad may significantly increase clinical suspicion for MODY and facilitate the process of selecting and referring suspected patients for genetic testing [15, 17, 20]. The refined diagnostic criteria for MODY include: persistent hyperglycemia in early adulthood (typically before 30 years); clinical features incompatible with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM, T2DM); diabetes in at least one first-degree relative; evidence of residual pancreatic function; and absence of beta cell autoimmunity. Currently, there is no concise or standardized diagnostic algorithm for MODY [16]. To address this issue, a systematic approach to the diagnosis of common MODY subtypes is presented in Fig. 1. Overall, a diagnosis of MODY requires a high index of suspicion, clinical assessment, diabetes-specific tests, and comprehensive genetic testing [15, 21].

Fig. 1
figure1

A systematic approach to the diagnosis of MODY. Diagnosis of MODY is a stepwise process guided by a high index of suspicion, clinical assessment, diabetes-specific tests, and comprehensive genetic testing. BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; GAD-65: glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 autoantibodies; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HDL: high density lipoprotein; IAA: insulin autoantibodies; IA-2A: tyrosine phosphatase-related islet antigen-2 autoantibodies; LDL: low density lipoprotein; OADs: oral antidiabetic drugs; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; RCAD: renal cysts and diabetes; T1DM: type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; ZnT8: zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies

Clinical assessment and comprehensive genetic testing (serial single gene testing or multigene panel) are used to distinguish MODY from other types of diabetes mellitus, guide specific treatment, identify MODY mutations in family members with hyperglycemia, and reduce the risk of complications in asymptomatic family members [4, 21,22,23]. If genetic testing fails to identify one of the common MODY subtypes, comprehensive genomic testing (chromosomal microarray analysis or exome sequencing) can be used to diagnose rare pathogenic subtypes [24], characterize breakage points of whole gene deletions [25], and identify MODY in patients with clinical features suggestive of contiguous gene deletion syndrome [26, 27]. Nevertheless, the lack of a non-genetic biomarker that accurately identifies patients who have MODY, financial burdens related to cost of genetic tests, and limited access to specialized genetic testing facilities for patients and their families are challenges in clinical practice yet to be fully resolved.

Epidemiology of MODY

Estimated incidence

MODY is usually diagnosed between the second and fifth decades of life [28], yet little is known about the global burden of the condition since population-based studies are seldom conducted. Table 1 presents a summary of the epidemiology of MODY based on available estimates from various countries. The minimum incidence of monogenic diabetes is estimated to be 0.2 cases per 100,000 children and youth below 18 years of age per year [41], while the estimated incidence of MODY is 2.4% in children and adolescents below 15 years of age with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus [29]. There are a number of potential explanations for the scarcity of incidence estimates in the literature including: frequent misdiagnosis of MODY due to insidious onset of symptoms; overlap of clinical features with T1DM and T2DM; and low rates of referral for early comprehensive genetic testing due to lack of awareness of MODY among clinicians.

Table 1 Country-specific incidence and prevalence estimates of MODY

Estimated prevalence

In contrast to incidence, the estimated prevalence of MODY is widely reported in the literature [31, 32, 39, 42]. The overall prevalence of MODY, mainly from European cohorts, is estimated to be 1–5 per 10,000 people, accounting for 1–5% of all diabetes mellitus cases [10, 28]. Current data suggests that prevalence of MODY varies by country [31]. Secondly, despite no reported ethnic predilection, prevalence of MODY varies by ethnicity [31], which may be due to disparities in availability and access to genetic testing [39]. Lastly, the estimated prevalence of MODY is 1 per 10,000 in adults and 1 per 23,000 in children [28], suggesting variation by age.

Prevalence of MODY in the European region

Due to well-maintained diabetes patient registries and centralized genetic testing facilities, MODY is well-studied in Europe, particularly the United Kingdom (UK), where monogenic diabetes has an estimated prevalence of 2.5% and the minimum prevalence of MODY is 68–108 cases per 1,000,000 [31, 33, 43, 44]. The most common subtypes in the UK are HNF1A-MODY (52% of all genetically confirmed cases), GCK-MODY (32%), HNF4A-MODY (10%), HNF1B-MODY (6%), and Neurogenic differentiation 1 (NEUROD1)-MODY or Insulin (INS)-MODY (less than 1%) [31, 33]. However, due to poor referral rates for genetic testing, approximately 80% of MODY cases in the UK are thought to be misdiagnosed as either T1DM or T2DM [33].

Prevalence estimates and MODY subtype distribution for young people living in Norway [34], Netherlands [31, 32], Germany [10, 30], and Poland [31, 45] are comparable to the UK. Importantly, the selection of participants for epidemiologic studies of MODY affects prevalence. For example, prevalence of genetically confirmed MODY is higher if autoantibody negative patients are recruited, such as in Norway (6.5%) [35], Sweden (1.2%) [36], and Lithuania (3.14%) [37], or if patients diagnosed with impaired fasting glycemia are included in studies, like in Italy (5.5%) [38].

Prevalence of MODY in non-European regions

While the prevalence of MODY in regions outside of Europe remains understudied, available reports suggest geographic and ethnic variation. In the United States, the estimated prevalence of MODY is 1.2% of all pediatric diabetes mellitus cases and the minimum prevalence of monogenic diabetes in youth below 20 years is estimated to be 21 per 1,000,000 [39]. In Western Australia on the other hand, the prevalence of MODY in diabetic patients below 35 years is 0.24%, which corresponds to an estimated minimum prevalence of 89 cases per 1,000,000 for the entire Australian population [40].

Unfortunately, the prevalence of MODY in African, Asian, South American, and Middle Eastern populations is not known. Clearly, research is needed to elucidate the exact prevalence of MODY in non-European regions. A recent study conducted in Brazil described the first case of NEUROD1-MODY in Latin America and identified a novel frameshift mutation [46], demonstrating that research in countries with multiethnic populations can enhance current understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of MODY.

Molecular pathogenesis and treatment of MODY

Various types of genetic mutations are implicated in the etiology of MODY [10, 47,48,49]. Table 2 presents the types of mutations associated with MODY and the affected chromosomes.

Table 2 MODY genes, chromosomal loci, and types of causative mutations

Currently, MODY is classified based on the affected gene [67, 68]. However, a gene-based approach to classification assumes that MODY is one disease entity despite evidence of clinical, genetic, and pathophysiologic heterogeneity among the 14 recognized subtypes. In order to expand the current classification scheme, MODY subtypes can be organized into five categories according to their underlying molecular pathogenesis: transcriptional regulation disorders (dysfunctional nuclear transcription factors); enzyme disorders (dysfunctional or deficient metabolic enzymes); protein misfolding disorders; ion channel disorders (dysfunctional ion channels); and signal transduction disorders. A summary of the molecular pathogenesis and treatment options for MODY is presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Underlying molecular pathogenesis and treatment of MODY

Transcriptional regulation disorders

HNF4A-MODY (subtype 1)

The hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4A) gene is expressed in liver, pancreatic islets cells and kidney. The HNF4A protein belongs to the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily of transcription factors and regulates expression of the HNF1A gene, hepatic gluconeogenesis, and lipoprotein biosynthesis [50]. Heterozygous mutations of this gene cause beta cell dysfunction, impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride [47, 49, 50]. HNF4A-MODY is characterized by fetal macrosomia, transient neonatal hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, progressive development of hyperglycemia, and onset of diabetes mellitus in late adolescence or by 25 years of age. Due to the progressive nature of HNF4A-MODY, patients are susceptible to diabetes-related complications. Low carbohydrate diet or low-dose sulfonylureas are used to manage HNF4A-MODY initially but insulin therapy is usually required in advanced disease or during pregnancy [21, 69, 70]. The beneficial role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in the management of patients with HNF4A-MODY has recently been reported [75]. Even though this finding is clinically significant, prospective studies are needed to help establish which patients should be offered incretin-based therapy.

HNF1A-MODY (subtype 3)

The hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha (HNF1A) gene is expressed in liver, pancreas, kidney, and intestine [51, 68]. The HNF1A protein is a member of the homeodomain-containing superfamily of nuclear transcription factors and regulates the expression of the genes that encode insulin (INS), glucose transporter (GLUT) 1 and 2, and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) [51, 76]. Heterozygous mutations in the HNF1A gene cause progressive beta cell dysfunction, reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and low renal threshold for glucose (glycosuria) [47, 49, 51, 77]. HNF1A-MODY is typified by transient neonatal hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, progressive development of hyperglycemia during childhood, and onset of diabetes mellitus by 25 years of age. Patients with HNF1A-MODY are usually at risk of developing diabetes-related complications because glycemic control worsens over time. Low carbohydrate diet or low-dose sulfonylureas are used to manage HNF1A-MODY initially but insulin therapy is required in later stages of the disease or during pregnancy [21, 69, 70]. The use of GLP-1 RAs to effectively manage HNF1A-MODY has been reported [78, 79] and validated in a single-center randomized clinical trial [71, 80]. Therefore, clinicians may consider treating patients who have HNF1A-MODY with GLP-1 RAs, especially if episodes of hypoglycemia limit the tolerability of sulfonylureas.

PDX1/IPF1-MODY (subtype 4)

The pancreas/duodenum homeobox 1 (PDX1) protein, also known as IPF1 (insulin promoter factor 1), is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates pancreatic development and beta cell function by activating the expression of glucagon, INS, GLUT2, and GCK genes [49, 81]. Heterozygous mutations in the PDX1 gene lead to beta cell dysfunction and defective insulin secretion [47, 49, 52]. PDX1-MODY is characterized by diabetes mellitus with variable age of onset (usually between 17 and 67 years) compared to other MODY subtypes [1]. Management options for PDX1-MODY include diet, oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), and insulin [21, 69].

HNF1B-MODY (subtype 5)

The hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF1B) protein, also known as transcription factor 2 (TCF2), is a member of the homeodomain-containing superfamily of nuclear transcription factors that regulates organogenesis of the pancreas, liver, genitourinary tract, kidney, intestine, and lungs [47, 82]. Heterozygous mutations cause beta cell dysfunction, hepatic insulin resistance, and a spectrum of congenital malformations termed renal cysts and diabetes (RCAD) syndrome [47, 49, 53, 83]. HNF1B-MODY exhibits variable multisystemic phenotypes characterized by a broad spectrum of pancreatic and extrapancreatic clinical manifestations [53, 84, 85]. Typically, renal disease occurs in childhood and diabetes mellitus arises in adolescence or early adulthood, with most affected individuals progressively requiring insulin. Management of HNF1B-MODY involves treatment of renal disease and early intensive insulin therapy to control hyperglycemia and delay the onset of microvascular complications [21, 69, 72].

NEUROD1-MODY (subtype 6)

The NEUROD1 gene is expressed in pancreatic and neuronal cells and the NEUROD1 protein is a basic helix-loop-helix nuclear transcription factor that regulates expression of the INS gene as well as pancreatic islet morphogenesis and neuronal development [54]. Heterozygous mutations in the NEUROD1 gene cause beta cell dysfunction [47, 49, 54]. NEUROD1-MODY is characterized by variable-onset diabetes mellitus with obese or non-obese phenotypes and occasional ketosis. Management options for NEUROD1-MODY include diet, OADs, or insulin [21, 69].

KLF11-MODY (subtype 7)

The krueppel-like factor 11 (KLF11) gene is expressed in pancreatic islets where it controls the expression of free radical scavengers such as catalase 1 and superoxide dismutase 2 [86]. The KLF11 protein is a zinc-finger nuclear transcription factor that controls beta cell function by acting as a glucose-inducible regulator of INS and PDX1 gene expression [55, 86, 87]. Heterozygous mutations in the KLF11 gene ultimately cause beta cell dysfunction and impaired insulin secretion [47, 49, 55, 86, 87]. Clinically, KLF11-MODY presents as early-onset diabetes mellitus and is managed with OADs or insulin [21, 69].

PAX4-MODY (subtype 9)

The paired box gene 4 (PAX4) protein is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates beta cell differentiation and represses the activity of INS and glucagon promoters [88]. Heterozygous mutations in the PAX4 gene cause abnormal beta cell development and lead to beta cell dysfunction and impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion [47, 49, 56]. PAX4-MODY is characterized by ketosis-prone diabetes mellitus [89] which is managed with diet, OADs, or insulin [21, 69].

BLK-MODY (subtype 11)

The B-lymphocyte specific tyrosine kinase (BLK) gene is a member of the SRC family of proto-oncogenes that is preferentially expressed in B-lymphocyte and beta cells [49, 57]. The BLK protein promotes insulin biosynthesis and secretion by upregulating the transcription factors PDX1 and NKX6.1 [57]. Heterozygous mutations in this gene attenuate BLK expression and/or activity resulting in PDX1 and NKX6.1 deficiency, defective glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and reduced beta cell mass [47, 49, 57]. BLK-MODY manifests as diabetes mellitus with an overweight phenotype and is managed with diet, OADs, or insulin [21, 69].

Enzyme disorders

GCK-MODY (subtype 2)

The GCK gene is expressed in liver and beta cells [49]. Glucokinase catalyzes adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent phosphorylation of glucose to produce glucose-6-phosphate, which is the rate-limiting reaction of glucose metabolism. Heterozygous mutations may either reduce enzymatic activity [90,91,92] or promote glucokinase misfolding, aggregation, and degradation [93,94,95], leading to defective glucose sensing in beta cells, elevated threshold for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and impaired postprandial hepatic glycogen storage [47, 49, 58, 96]. GCK-MODY is generally non-progressive and characterized by preserved insulin secretion, mild fasting hyperglycemia present from birth, and minor postprandial glucose excursions. Consequently, this subtype is detected incidentally and treatment with glucose-lowering medications is unnecessary since patients tend to be asymptomatic [21, 69, 73, 97]. However, insulin is indicated during pregnancy to treat maternal hyperglycemia and reduce the risk of fetal macrosomia if serial ultrasound biometry suggests that the fetus has not inherited the maternal GCK mutation [69, 70, 74, 97, 98].

Protein misfolding disorders

CEL-MODY (subtype 8)

The carboxyl-ester lipase (CEL) gene is expressed in acinar cells of the exocrine pancreas where it encodes a bile salt-dependent lipase that is incorporated into pancreatic digestive juice. The carboxyl-ester lipase hydrolyzes cholesterol esters and lipid soluble vitamins in the small intestine. Heterozygous mutations in the CEL gene are associated with early pancreatic atrophy and subsequent exocrine insufficiency, pancreatic lipomatosis, and endocrine dysfunction due to misfolding and cytotoxic aggregation of carboxyl-ester lipase [47, 49, 59, 99,100,101]. CEL-MODY presents as adulthood-onset diabetes mellitus and is treated with OADs or insulin [21, 69].

INS-MODY (subtype 10)

INS-MODY is caused by heterozygous mutations in the gene that encodes preproinsulin, the biologically inactive precursor of the insulin protein. Mutations in the INS gene cause severe misfolding and intracellular accumulation of proinsulin, defective nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kappa B), and abnormal insulin biosynthesis [47, 49, 60]. Consequently, prolonged endoplasmic reticulum stress activates the terminal unfolded protein response and leads to the induction of beta cell apoptosis. INS-MODY is characterized by reduced beta cell mass, progressive loss of insulin secretion, and variable-onset diabetes mellitus that is managed with diet, OADs, or insulin [21, 69].

Ion channel disorders

ABCC8-MODY (subtype 12)

The ATP-binding cassette transporter subfamily C member 8 (ABCC8) gene is expressed in the pancreas where it controls the expression of the sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) subunit of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel found on the beta cell membrane. Opening and closing of the potassium channel regulates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by coupling blood glucose levels and intracellular ATP concentration to the beta cell membrane’s electrical activity. Heterozygous mutations affecting the ABCC8 gene disrupt the potassium channel’s normal function leading to impaired insulin secretion [47, 61, 62, 102]. ABCC8-MODY may be characterized by congenital hypoglycemic hyperinsulinism, a transient or permanent form of neonatal diabetes mellitus, or adulthood-onset diabetes mellitus [61, 62, 102]. Sulfonylureas are the standard treatment option for ABCC8-MODY [21, 69].

KCNJ11-MODY (subtype 13)

The potassium channel inwardly rectifying subfamily J member 11 (KCNJ11) gene is highly expressed in the pancreas where it encodes the pore-forming Kir6.2 subunit of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel. Similar to ABCC8-MODY, heterozygous mutations in the KCNJ11 cause defective glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by disrupting the activity of the potassium channel [47, 63, 64, 102]. KCNJ11-MODY may be characterized by congenital hypoglycemic hyperinsulinism, a transient or permanent form of neonatal diabetes mellitus, or late-onset diabetes mellitus [63, 64, 102]. Sulfonylureas are the treatment of choice for KCNJ11-MODY [21, 69].

Signal transduction disorders

APPL1-MODY (subtype 14)

The adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interaction, PH domain, and leucine zipper-containing protein 1 (APPL1) gene is highly expressed in skeletal muscle, pancreas, liver, and adipose tissue. The APPL1 protein propagates the insulin signal within cells by interacting with key mediators including Akt serine/threonine kinase 2 (Akt2), insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2, and the insulin receptor [65, 103,104,105,106]. Additionally, APPL1 controls insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue [65, 105]. Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in this gene lead to defective glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and reduced survival of beta cells [49, 65, 66, 106]. APPL1-MODY is a rare subtype and management options include diet, OADs, and insulin [21, 69].

Conclusions

In conclusion, MODY accounts for 1–5% of all diabetes mellitus cases. Clinical assessment and comprehensive genetic testing are used to diagnose and classify MODY. Incidence and prevalence estimates for MODY are derived from epidemiologic studies of young people with diabetes who live in Europe, Australia, and North America. Mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of MODY include defective transcriptional regulation, abnormal metabolic enzymes, protein misfolding, dysfunctional ion channels, or impaired signal transduction. Management of MODY is subtype-specific and established treatment options include diet, oral antidiabetic drugs, or insulin. Clinicians should possess a thorough understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of MODY in order to accurately diagnose patients, individualize patient management and follow-up, and screen family members of affected individuals for diabetes mellitus.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ABCC8:

ATP-binding cassette transporter subfamily C member 8

Akt2:

Akt serine/threonine kinase 2

APPL1:

Adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interaction, PH domain, and leucine zipper-containing protein 1

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

BLK:

B-lymphocyte specific tyrosine kinase

CEL:

Carboxyl-ester lipase

GCK:

Glucokinase

GLP-1 RAs:

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

GLUT:

Glucose transporter

HNFs:

Hepatocyte nuclear factors

HNF1A:

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha

HNF4A:

Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4 alpha

HNF1B:

Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 beta

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

INS:

Insulin

IPF1:

Insulin promoter factor 1

IRS:

Insulin receptor substrate

KCNJ11:

Potassium channel inwardly rectifying subfamily J member 11

KLF11:

Krueppel-like factor 11

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

NEUROD1:

Neurogenic differentiation 1

NF-kappa B:

Nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

MODY:

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young

OADS:

Oral antidiabetic drugs

PAX4:

Paired box gene 4

PDX1:

Pancreas/duodenum homeobox 1

RCAD:

Renal cysts and diabetes

SGLT2:

Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2

SUR 1:

Sulfonylurea receptor 1

TCF2:

Transcription factor 2

T1DM:

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

UK:

United Kingdom

References

  1. 1.

    Sanyoura M, Philipson LH, Naylor R. Monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents: recognition and treatment options. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(8):58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tattersall RB, Fajans SS. A difference between the inheritance of classical juvenile-onset and maturity-onset type diabetes of young people. Diabetes. 1975;18(8):44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tattersall R. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young: a clinical history. Diabet Med. 1998;15(1):11–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fajans SS, Bell GI. MODY: history, genetics, pathophysiology, and clinical decision making. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1878–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kavvoura FK, Owen KR. Maturity onset diabetes of the young: clinical characteristics, diagnosis and management. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2013;10(2):234–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hoffman LS, Jialal I. Diabetes, maturity onset in the young (MODY). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532900/.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fajans SS, Bell GI, Polonsky KS. Molecular mechanisms and clinical pathophysiology of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(13):971–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oliveira SC, Neves JS, Perez A, Carvalho D. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young: from a molecular basis perspective toward the clinical phenotype and proper management. Endocrinol Nutr. 2020;67(2):137–47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Urakami T. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): current perspectives and treatment. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1047–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Firdous P, Nissar K, Ali S, Ganai BA, Shabir U, Hassan T, Masoodi SR. Genetic testing of maturity-onset diabetes of the young current status and future perspectives. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Anik A, Catli G, Abaci A, Bober E. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): an update. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28(3–4):251–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baldacchino I, Pace NP, Vassallo J. Screening for monogenic diabetes in primary care. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020;14(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ellard S, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Hattersley AT. Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Diabetologia. 2008;51(4):546–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Al-Kandari H, Al-Abdulrazzaq D, Davidsson L, Al-Mulla F. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): a time to act. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(7):565–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Peixoto-Barbosa R, Reis AF, Giuffrida FMA. Update on clinical screening of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;8(12):50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Urbanová J, Brunerová L, Brož J. Hidden MODY-looking for a needle in a haystack. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pinelli M, Acquaviva F, Barbetti F, Caredda E, Cocozza S, Delvecchio M, et al. Identification of candidate children for maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 2 (MODY2) gene testing: a seven-item clinical flowchart (7-iF). Plos One. 2013;8(11):e79933.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lizarzaburu-Robles JC, Gomez-de-la-Torre JC, Castro-Mujica MDC, Vento F, Villanes S, Salsavilca E, et al. Atypical hyperglycemia presentation suggests considering a diagnostic of other types of diabetes: first reported GCK-MODY in Perú. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;6:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stanik J, Dusatkova P, Cinek O, Valentinova L, Huckova M, Skopkova M, et al. De novo mutations of GCK, HNF1A and HNF4A may be more frequent in MODY than previously assumed. Diabetologia. 2014;57(3):480–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thanabalasingham G, Pal A, Selwood MP, Dudley C, Fisher K, Bingley PJ, et al. Systematic assessment of etiology in adults with a clinical diagnosis of young-onset type 2 diabetes is a successful strategy for identifying maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1206–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Naylor R, Knight Johnson A, del Gaudio D. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young overview. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., editors. GeneReviews. Seattle: University of Washington; 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500456/.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Juszczak A, Pryse R, Schuman A, Owen KR. When to consider a diagnosis of MODY at the presentation of diabetes: aetiology matters for correct management. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(647):e457–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wedrychowicz A, Tobor E, Wilk M, Ziolkowska-Ledwith E, Rams A, Wzorek K, et al. Phenotype heterogeneity in glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) patients. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2017;9(3):246–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Johansson S, Irgens H, Chudasama KK, Molnes J, Aerts J, Roque FS, et al. Exome sequencing and genetic testing for MODY. Plos One. 2012;7(5):e38050.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ellard S, Thomas K, Edghill EL, Owens M, Ambye L, Cropper J, et al. Partial and whole gene deletion mutations of the GCK and HNF1A genes in maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Diabetologia. 2007;50(11):2313–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zung A, Petek E, Ben-Zeev B, Schwarzbraun T, Ben-Yehoshua SJ. MODY type 2 in Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome (GCPS) as part of a contiguous gene deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(10):2469–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nagamani SC, Erez A, Shen J, Li C, Roeder E, Cox S, et al. Clinical spectrum associated with recurrent genomic rearrangements in chromosome 17q12. Eur J Human Genet. 2010;18(3):278–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Owen K. MODY. In: Orphanet; 2014. Available from: https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?Lng=GB&Expert=552.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Galler A, Stange T, Muller G, Nake A, Vogel C, Kapellen T, et al. Incidence of childhood diabetes in children aged less than 15 years and its clinical and metabolic characteristics at the time of diagnosis: data from the childhood diabetes registry of Saxony. Germany Horm Res in Paediatr. 2010;74(4):285–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Neu A, Feldhahn L, Ehehalt S, Hub R, Ranke MB, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents is still a rare disease in Germany: a population-based assessment of the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and MODY in patients aged 0-20 years. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009;10(7):468–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kleinberger JW, Pollin TI. Undiagnosed MODY: time for action. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(12):110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Weinreich SS, Bosma A, Henneman L, Rigter T, Spruijt CM, Grimbergen AJ, et al. A decade of molecular genetic testing for MODY: a retrospective study of utilization in the Netherlands. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23(1):29–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shields BM, Hicks S, Shepherd MH, Colclough K, Hattersley AT, Ellard S. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): how many cases are we missing? Diabetologia. 2010;53(12):2504–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Irgens HU, Molnes J, Johansson BB, Ringdal M, Skrivarhaug T, Undlien DE, et al. Prevalence of monogenic diabetes in the population-based Norwegian childhood diabetes registry. Diabetologia. 2013;56(7):1512–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Johansson BB, Irgens HU, Molnes J, Sztromwasser P, Aukrust I, Juliusson PB, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals MODY in up to 6.5% of antibody-negative diabetes cases listed in the Norwegian childhood diabetes registry. Diabetologia. 2017;60(4):625–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Carlsson A, Shepherd M, Ellard S, Weedon M, Lernmark A, Forsander G, et al. Absence of islet autoantibodies and modestly raised glucose values at diabetes diagnosis should lead to testing for MODY: lessons from a 5-year pediatric Swedish national cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(1):82–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stankute I, Verkauskiene R, Blouin JL, Klee P, Dobrovolskiene R, Danyte E, et al. Systematic genetic study of youth with diabetes in a single country reveals the prevalence of diabetes subtypes, novel candidate genes, and response to precision therapy. Diabetes. 2020;69(5):1065–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Delvecchio M, Mozzillo E, Salzano G, Iafusco D, Frontino G, Patera PI, et al. Monogenic diabetes accounts for 6.3% of cases referred to 15 Italian pediatric diabetes centers during 2007 to 2012. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(6):1826–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Ellard S, Davelea D, Davis C, Dolan LM, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and clinical diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young due to mutations in HNF1A, HNF4A, and glucokinase: results from the SEARCH for diabetes in youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):4055–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Davis TM, Makepeace AE, Ellard S, Colclough K, Peters K, Hattersley A, et al. The prevalence of monogenic diabetes in Australia: the Fremantle diabetes study phase II. Med J Aust. 2017;207(8):344–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Amed S, Dean HJ, Panagiotopoulos C, Sellers EA, Hadjivannakis S, Laubscher TA, et al. Type 2 diabetes, medication-induced diabetes, and monogenic diabetes in Canadian children: a prospective national surveillance study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):786–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sanyoura M, Letourneau L, Knight Johnson AE, Del Gaudio D, Greeley SAW, Philipson LH, Naylor RN. GCK-MODY in the US monogenic diabetes registry: description of 27 unpublished variants. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;151:231–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Shepherd M, Shields B, Hammersley S, Hudson M, McDonald TJ, Colclough K, et al. Systematic population screening, using biomarkers and genetic testing, identifies 2.5% of the U.K. population with monogenic diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):1879–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kropff J, Selwood MP, McCarthy MI, Farmer AJ, Owen KR. Prevalence of monogenic diabetes in young adults: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Oxfordshire. UK Diabetologia. 2011;54(5):1261–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Fendler W, Borowiec M, Baranowska-Jazwiecka A, Szadkowska A, Skala-Zamorowska E, Deja G, et al. Prevalence of monogenic diabetes amongst polish children after a nationwide genetic screening campaign. Diabetologia. 2012;55(10):2631–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Abreu GM, Tarantino RM, Cabello PH, Zembrzuski VM, da Fonseca ACP, Rodacki M, et al. The first case of NEUROD1-MODY reported in Latin America. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(12):e989.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Inoue I, Nakaoka H. Genetics of diabetes: are they thrifty genotype? In: Saitou N, editor. Evolution of the human genome I: the genome and genes. Tokyo: Springer; 2018. p. 265–72.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Schwitzgebel VM. Many faces of monogenic diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2014;5(2):121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young; MODY. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. MIM Number: # 606391: 2016. Available from: https://www.omim.org/entry/606391.

  50. 50.

    Yamagata K, Furuta H, Oda N, Kaisaki PJ, Menzel S, Cox NJ, et al. Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha gene in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY1). Nature. 1996;384(6608):458–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Valkovicova T, Skopkova M, Stanik J, Gasperikova D. Novel insights into genetics and clinics of the HNF1A-MODY. Endocr Regul. 2019;53(2):110–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Macfarlane WM, Frayling TM, Ellard S, Evans JC, Allen LI, Bulman MP, et al. Missense mutations in the insulin promoter factor-1 gene predispose to type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(9):R33–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lim SH, Kim JH, Han KH, Ahn YH, Kang HG, Ha IS, et al. Genotype and phenotype analyses in pediatric patients with HNF1B mutations. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7):2320.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Malecki MT, Jhala US, Antonellis A, Fields L, Doria A, Orban T, et al. Mutations in NEUROD1 are associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Genet. 1999;23(3):323–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Fernandez-Zapico ME, van Velkinburgh JC, Gutierrez-Aguilar R, Neve B, Froguel P, Urrutia R, Stein R. MODY7 gene, KLF11, is a novel p300-dependent regulator of Pdx-1 (MODY4) transcription in pancreatic islet beta cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(52):36482–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Plengvidhya N, Kooptiwut S, Songtawee N, Doi A, Furuta H, Nishi M, et al. PAX4 mutations in Thais with maturity onset diabetes of the young. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(7):2821–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Borowiec M, Liew CW, Thompson R, Boonyasrisawat W, Hu J, Mlynarski WM, et al. Mutations at the BLK locus linked to maturity-onset diabetes of the young and beta-cell dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(34):14460–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Osbak KK, Colclough K, Saint-Martin C, Beer NL, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Ellard S, Gloyn AL. Update on mutations in glucokinase (GCK), which cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young, permanent neonatal diabetes, and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(11):1512–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Torsvik J, Johansson S, Johansen A, Ek J, Minton J, Raeder H, et al. Mutations in the VNTR of the carboxyl-ester lipase gene (CEL) are a rare cause of monogenic diabetes. Hum Genet. 2010;127(1):55–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Molven A, Ringdal M, Nordbø AM, Raeder H, Støv J, Lipkind GM, et al. Mutations in the insulin gene can cause MODY and autoantibody-negative type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2008;57(4):1131–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bowman P, Flanagan SE, Edghill EL, Damhuis A, Shepherd MH, Paisey R, et al. Heterozygous ABCC8 mutations are a cause of MODY. Diabetologia. 2012;55(1):123–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Huopio H, Otonkoski T, Vauhkonen I, Reimann F, Ashcroft FM, Laakso M. A new subtype of autosomal dominant diabetes attributable to a mutation in the gene for sulfonylurea receptor 1. Lancet. 2003;361(9354):301–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bonnefond A, Philippe J, Durand E, Dechaume A, Huyvaert M, Montagne L, et al. Whole-exome sequencing and high throughput genotyping identified KCNJ11 as the thirteenth MODY gene. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37423.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yorifuji T, Nagashima K, Kurokawa K, Kawai M, Oishi M, Hosokawa M, et al. The C42R mutation in the Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) gene as a cause of transient neonatal diabetes, childhood diabetes, or later-onset, apparently type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(6):3174–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ivanoshchuk DE, Shakhtshneider EV, Rymar OD, Ovsyannikova AK, Mikhailova SV, Orlov PS, et al. Analysis of APPL1 gene polymorphisms in patients with a phenotype of maturity onset diabetes of the young. J Pers Med. 2020;10(3):E100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Prudente S, Jungtrakoon P, Marucci A, Ludovico O, Buranasupkajorn P, Mazza T, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in APPL1 in familial diabetes mellitus. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(1):177–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Murphy R, Ellard S, Hattersley AT. Clinical implications of a molecular genetic classification of monogenic beta-cell diabetes. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4(4):200–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jang KM. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young: update and perspectives on diagnosis and treatment. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020;37(1):13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Delvecchio M, Pastore C, Giordano P. Treatment options for MODY patients: a systematic review of literature. Diabetes Ther. 2020;11(8):1667–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Dickens LT, Naylor RN. Clinical management of women with monogenic diabetes during pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(3):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Østoft SH, Bagger JI, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Fabe J, Holst JJ, et al. Glucose-lowering effects and low risk of hypoglycemia in patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young when treated with a GLP-1 receptor agonist: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):1797–805.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Warncke K, Kummer S, Raile K, Grulich-Henn J, Woelfle J, Steichen E, et al. Frequency and characteristics of MODY 1 (HNF4A mutation) and MODY 5 (HNF1B mutation): analysis from the DPV database. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(3):845–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Klupa T, Solecka I, Nowak N, Szopa M, Kiec-Wilk B, Skupien J, et al. The influence of dietary carbohydrate content on glycaemia in patients with glucokinase maturity-onset diabetes of the young. J Int Med Res. 2011;39(6):2296–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Dickens LT, Letourneau LR, Sanyoura M, Greeley SAW, Philipson LH, Naylor RN. Management and pregnancy outcomes of women with GCK-MODY enrolled in the US monogenic diabetes registry. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(4):405–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Broome DT, Tekin Z, Pantalone KM, Mehta AE. Novel use of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in HNF4A-MODY. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(6):e65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Haliyur R, Tong X, Sanyoura M, Shrestha S, Lindner J, Saunders DC, et al. Human islets expressing HNF1A variant have defective β cell transcriptional regulatory networks. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(1):246–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yamagata K, Oda N, Kaisaki PJ, Menzel S, Furuta H, Vaxillaire M, et al. Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha gene in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY3). Nature. 1996;384(6608):455–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Docena MK, Faiman C, Stanley CM, Pantalone KM. Mody-3: novel HNF1A mutation and the utility of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonist therapy. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(2):107–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Fantasia KL, Steenkamp DW. Optimal glycemic control in a patient with HNF1A MODY with GLP-1 RA monotherapy: implications for future therapy. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3(12):2286–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Østoft SH. Incretin hormones and maturity onset diabetes of the young--pathophysiological implications and antidiabetic-treatment potential. Dan Med J. 2015;62(9):B4860.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Ahlgren U, Edlund H. Homeodomain proteins in pancreas development. In: Habener JF, Hussain M, editors. Molecular basis of pancreas development and function. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Bellané-Chantelot C, Clauin S, Chauveau D, Collin D, Daumont M, Douillard C, et al. Large genomic rearrangements in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta (TCF2) gene are the most frequent cause of maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5. Diabetes. 2005;54(11):3126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Faguer S, Chassaing N, Bandin F, Prouheze C, Garnier A, Casemayou A, et al. The HNF1B score is a simple tool to select patients for HNF1B gene analysis. Kidney Int. 2014;86(5):1007–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Verhave JC, Bech AP, Wetzels JF, Nijenhuis T. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β-associated kidney disease: more than renal cysts and diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(2):345–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    El-Khairi R, Vallier L. The role of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β in disease and development. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(Suppl 1):23–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Neve B, Fernandez-Zapico ME, Ashkenazi-Katalan V, Dina C, Hamid YH, Joly E, et al. Role of transcription factor KLF11 and its diabetes-associated gene variants in pancreatic beta cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(13):4807–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lomberk G, Grzenda A, Mathison A, Escande C, Zhang JS, Calvo E, et al. Krüppel-like factor 11 regulates the expression of metabolic genes via an evolutionarily conserved protein interaction domain functionally disrupted in maturity-onset diabetes of the young. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(24):17745–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Smith SB, Ee HC, Conners JR, German MS. Paired-homeodomain transcription factor PAX4 acts as a transcriptional repressor in early pancreatic development. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(12):8272–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Mauvais-Jarvis F, Smith SB, Le May C, Leal SM, Gautier JF, Molokhia M, et al. PAX4 gene variations predispose to ketosis-prone diabetes. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(24):3151–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Galán M, Vincent O, Roncero I, Azriel S, Boix-Pallares P, Delgado-Alvarez E, et al. Effects of novel maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)-associated mutations on glucokinase activity and protein stability. Biochem J. 2006;393(Pt 1):389–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Capuano M, Garcia-Herrero CM, Tinto N, Carluccio C, Capobianco V, Coto I, et al. Glucokinase (GCK) mutations and their characterization in MODY2 children of southern Italy. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38906.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Valentínová L, Beer NL, Staník J, Tribble ND, van de Bunt M, Hučková M, et al. Identification and functional characterization of novel glucokinase mutations causing maturity-onset diabetes of the young in Slovakia. Plos One. 2012;7(4):e34541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Cho EH, Min JW, Choi SS, Choi HS, Kim SW. Identification of maturity-onset diabetes of the young caused by glucokinase mutations detected using whole-exome sequencing. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2017;32(2):296–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Negahdar M, Aukrust I, Molnes J, Solheim MH, Johansson BB, Sagen JV, et al. GCK-MODY diabetes as a protein misfolding disease: the mutation R275C promotes protein misfolding, self-association and cellular degradation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;382(1):55–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Negahdar M, Aukrust I, Johansson BB, Molnes J, Molven A, Matschinsky FM, et al. GCK-MODY diabetes associated with protein misfolding, cellular self-association and degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(11):1705–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Froguel P, Vaxillaire M, Sun F, Velho G, Zouali H, Butel MO, et al. Close linkage of glucokinase locus on chromosome 7p to early-onset non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Nature. 1992;356(6365):162–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Chakera AJ, Steele AM, Gloyn AL, Shepherd MH, Shields B, Ellard S, et al. Recognition and management of individuals with hyperglycemia because of a heterozygous glucokinase mutation. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(7):1383–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Rudland VL. Diagnosis and management of glucokinase monogenic diabetes in pregnancy: current perspectives. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1081–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Raeder H, Johansson S, Holm PI, Haldorsen IS, Mas E, Sbarra V, et al. Mutations in the CEL VNTR cause a syndrome of diabetes and pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. Nat Genet. 2006;38(1):54–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Johansson BB, Torsvik J, Bjørkhaug L, Vesterhus M, Ragvin A, Tjora E, et al. Diabetes and pancreatic exocrine dysfunction due to mutations in the carboxyl ester lipase gene-maturity onset diabetes of the young (CEL-MODY): a protein misfolding disease. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(40):34593–605.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Dalva M, Lavik IK, El Jellas K, Gravdal A, Lugea A, Pandol SJ, et al. Pathogenic carboxyl ester lipase (CEL) variants interact with the normal CEL protein in pancreatic cells. Cells. 2020;9(1):244.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    De Franco E, Saint-Martin C, Brusgaard K, Knight Johnson AE, Aguilar-Bryan L, Bowman P, et al. Update of variants identified in the pancreatic β-cell KATP channel genes KCNJ11 and ABCC8 in individuals with congenital hyperinsulinism and diabetes. Hum Mutat. 2020;41(5):884–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Saito T, Jones CC, Huang S, Czech MP, Pilch PF. The interaction of Akt with APPL1 is required for insulin-stimulated Glut4 translocation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(44):32280–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Ryu J, Galan AK, Xin X, Dong F, Abdul-Ghani MA, Zhou L, et al. APPL1 potentiates insulin sensitivity by facilitating the binding of IRS1/2 to the insulin receptor. Cell Rep. 2014;7(4):1227–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Cheng KK, Lam KS, Wu D, Wang Y, Sweeney G, Hoo RL, et al. APPL1 potentiates insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells by enhancing protein kinase Akt-dependent expression of SNARE proteins in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(23):8919–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Schenck A, Goto-Silva L, Collinet C, Rhinn M, Giner A, Habermann B, et al. The endosomal protein Appl1 mediates Akt substrate specificity and cell survival in vertebrate development. Cell. 2008;133(3):486–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KMN, DKN, and TNN contributed equally to the content of the review article. DKN and TNN collected relevant articles and undertook literature review. KMN prepared the figure and tables and drafted the manuscript. TNN and DKN critically reviewed and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Munene Nkonge.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nkonge, K.M., Nkonge, D.K. & Nkonge, T.N. The epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 6, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-020-00112-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Beta cell
  • Diagnosis
  • MODY
  • Monogenic diabetes
  • Pathogenesis
  • Prevalence
  • Treatment